ESG Reporting Frameworks & Standards: A Complete Guide

ESG reporting frameworks help organizations disclose their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance in a structured, credible, and comparable manner. As regulations tighten globally and investors demand greater transparency, understanding which ESG reporting framework or standard to use has become critical for companies of all sizes.

This guide explains ESG reporting frameworks, standards, and regulations, compares the most widely used global frameworks, and helps you decide which ESG framework is right for your organization in 2026 and beyond.

What Are ESG Reporting Frameworks?

ESG reporting frameworks provide guidance on how organizations should structure and present ESG-related disclosures. They outline what topics to cover, how information should be organized, and how ESG performance can be communicated consistently to stakeholders.

These frameworks do not always mandate specific metrics. Instead, they offer a reporting structure that allows companies to explain their ESG strategy, risks, opportunities, and impacts in a standardized way.

ESG reporting frameworks are commonly used by:

• Corporates and listed companies
• Financial institutions and asset managers
• Private equity and venture capital firms
• Multinational organizations operating across jurisdictions

ESG Frameworks vs ESG Standards vs ESG Regulations

Understanding the difference between frameworks, standards, and regulations is essential for accurate ESG reporting.

ESG Reporting Frameworks

Frameworks define the structure of ESG disclosures. They explain what topics to report on and how to present information.

Examples:

• GRI (Global Reporting Initiative)
• TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures)

ESG Reporting Standards

Standards define specific, measurable requirements for ESG disclosures. They often include detailed metrics and indicators.

Examples:

• SASB Standards
• ISSB Standards
• ESRS (European Sustainability Reporting Standards)

ESG Regulations

Regulations make ESG reporting mandatory under law. They specify who must report, what must be disclosed, and when.

Examples:

• CSRD (EU)
• SEBI BRSR (India)

Why Are There So Many ESG Reporting Frameworks?

The ESG landscape evolved across regions and stakeholder needs. Investors prioritized financial materiality, regulators focused on accountability, and civil society emphasized sustainability impact. This resulted in multiple frameworks addressing different objectives.

However, global consolidation is now underway, with frameworks aligning under common standards such as ISSB and ESRS.

List of Major ESG Reporting Frameworks and Standards

Below are the most widely used ESG frameworks and standards globally.

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) is one of the most widely adopted ESG reporting frameworks globally. It focuses on an organization’s impact on the economy, environment, and society.

Best suited for:

• Organizations focused on sustainability impact
• Stakeholder-driven reporting

Key characteristics:

• Impact materiality approach
• Applicable across industries
• Strong alignment with SDGs

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)

SASB provides industry-specific ESG standards designed to identify financially material sustainability topics.

Best suited for:

• Investor-focused ESG reporting
• Public companies

Key characteristics:

• Financial materiality focus
• Industry-specific metrics
• Strong capital markets relevance

Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)

TCFD focuses on climate-related risks and opportunities and their financial implications.

Best suited for:

• Climate risk disclosure
• Financial institutions and large corporates

Key characteristics:

• Governance, strategy, risk management, metrics
• Scenario analysis emphasis
• Widely adopted by regulators

International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)

ISSB, under the IFRS Foundation, aims to create a global baseline for sustainability-related financial disclosures.

Best suited for:

• Companies reporting to global investors
• Cross-border compliance

Key characteristics:

• Builds upon SASB and TCFD
• Financial materiality focus
• Global investor comparability

European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)

ESRS are mandatory reporting standards under the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).

Best suited for:

• EU-based companies
• Non-EU companies with EU operations

Key characteristics:

• Double materiality approach
• Detailed and mandatory disclosures
• Strong regulatory enforcement

Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP)

CDP focuses on environmental disclosures related to climate change, water security, and deforestation.

Best suited for:

• Environmental performance reporting
• Investor and supply-chain disclosures

Integrated Reporting Framework (IR)

The Integrated Reporting Framework emphasizes value creation across financial and non-financial capitals.

Best suited for:

• Strategic ESG communication
• Board-level reporting

How Many ESG Frameworks Are There?

There are over a dozen globally recognized ESG frameworks and standards. However, most organizations rely on a combination of 2–4 frameworks to meet regulatory, investor, and stakeholder expectations.

Global consolidation is reducing fragmentation, with ISSB and ESRS emerging as dominant standards.

Which ESG Reporting Framework Should You Choose?

The right ESG framework depends on:

• Regulatory jurisdiction
• Investor expectations
• Industry sector
• Organizational size and maturity

Quick Guidance:

• EU exposure: ESRS + ISSB
• Investor-focused: ISSB + SASB
• Impact-focused: GRI
• Climate disclosure: TCFD + ISSB
• India-based companies: SEBI BRSR + GRI/ISSB

ESG Reporting Frameworks and ESG Software

As ESG reporting becomes more complex, many organizations use ESG reporting software to:

• Map data to multiple frameworks
• Automate disclosures
• Ensure audit readiness
• Track compliance across jurisdictions

Technology plays a key role in aligning frameworks such as GRI, ISSB, and ESRS efficiently.

Key Trends in ESG Reporting Frameworks (2025–2026)

• Regulatory-driven ESG disclosures becoming mandatory
• Convergence of standards under ISSB
• Increased assurance and audit requirements
• Greater focus on data quality and traceability

Final Thoughts

ESG reporting frameworks are no longer optional. They form the foundation of transparent, credible, and compliant sustainability reporting. Organizations that align early with globally accepted frameworks and standards will be better positioned to meet regulatory requirements, attract investors, and build long-term trust.

Understanding the differences between ESG frameworks, standards, and regulations is the first step toward effective ESG reporting in a rapidly evolving global landscape.

‍